Editorial: Don’t undermine preservation efforts

06/13/2013 8:00 AM |
GOOGLE MAPS | The land Suffolk County is looking to preserve is on the west side of Park Road and fronts Sound Avenue.

GOOGLE MAPS | The land Suffolk County is looking to preserve is on the west side of Park Road and fronts Sound Avenue, just south of the Reeves Park neighborhood.

Riverhead Town should not dare to scuttle Suffolk County’s plans to purchase 15 acres of farmland along Sound Avenue for preservation.

The property stretches north into the Reeves Park neighborhood, and Reeves Park residents — as well as others across the North Fork and all Suffolk County — have made it clear that developing the state-designated rural corridor is not in the best interest of the neighbors, or the region as a whole.

Yet town council members Jodi Giglio and George Gabrielsen have said they don’t want the town to contribute the $75,000 that would allow the joint purchase to move forward. They argue the town shouldn’t be taking developable land off tax rolls and that Riverhead’s preservation funds are dwindling. But last we checked, housing developments weren’t exactly money-makers. And $75,000 for 15 acres is an excellent deal that won’t break the bank.

The two council members have the power to block the move. Supervisor Sean Walter has recused himself from a vote because he used to represent property owner Ed Broidy as a lawyer. If Ms. Giglio and Mr. Gabrielsen do kill the measure, they would not be acting as fiscal conservatives, as they might believe. They would instead be acting penny wise and pound foolish, as Councilman James Wooten has said.

Too much money and effort have been invested over decades into preserving Sound Avenue as a treasure for all Long Islanders, starting in earnest with the two-lane highway’s designation by the state as a historic rural corridor. There have been years of litigation between the town and Mr. Broidy since the town’s master plan rezoned the land (and other parcels on Sound Avenue). In the meantime, former county legislator Ed Romaine lobbied hard to get support for Suffolk County’s purchase of the Broidy property, with area civic leaders and other residents showing up in Hauppauge to support preservation efforts. This newspaper took the unusual step of running an opinion-based photo spread of rural Sound Avenue on its cover, urging the county to act to protect the corridor. Residents later displayed those photos to county lawmakers in Hauppauge to help win support for the cause.

Throw into the mix developer Kenn Barra, who has recently sold a 4.1-acre property on the east side of Park Road, also fronting Sound Avenue, to the county for parkland. That done, one might have thought preservation of the Broidy land was also nearing the finish line.

But now it seems the deal might be dead — and over a measly $75,000?

Suffolk County Legislator Al Krupski should step in and pressure Ms. Giglio and Mr. Gabrielsen to vote with their constituents. There may be no better example in this town of open space that should be preserved. It’s been 10 years since Mr. Broidy proposed a 22,000-square-foot shopping center for the site, causing great dismay among preservationists and everyday citizens. It’s now time to put this all behind us.

8 Comment

  • hermes bags amazon 99 cent kindle books Editorial: Don’t undermine decades of Sound Avenue protection | Riverhead News Review

  • hermes bags paris Editorial: Don’t undermine decades of Sound Avenue protection | Riverhead News Review

  • hermes shop leipzig karl liebknecht Editorial: Don’t undermine decades of Sound Avenue protection | Riverhead News Review

  • Have needed katefwbq’s for years and just couldn’t find the right kinds, but upon seeing this one particular. I like them, Now I just hope I can keep myself from buying an additional one. :)

  • Do not you obtain it, We need to demonstrate our resolve with these persons and let them know that there will probably be strong action towards any attacks on our nation and embassy’s.

  • [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/mulberry.asp]mulberry skjerf[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/mulberry.html]mulberry oslo[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/marcjacobs.html]marc jacobs lommebok[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/mulberry.asp]mulberry vesker[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/marcjacobs.asp]marc jacobs klokke[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/marcjacobs.html]marc by marc jacobs[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/mulberry.asp]mulberry norge[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/marcjacobs.html]marc jacobs vesker[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/marcjacobs.asp]Marc By Marc Jacobs[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/marcjacobs.html]marc jacobs klokke[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/marcjacobs.asp]marc jacobs vesker[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/mulberry.html]mulberry veske[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/marcjacobs.asp]marc jacobs oslo[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/mulberry.html]mulberry skjerf[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/marcjacobs.html]marc jacobs oslo[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/mulberry.html]mulberry norge[/url]
    [url=http://www.tinasand.no/mulberry.html]mulberry vesker[/url]
    [url=http://www.labyrinthpress.no/mulberry.asp]mulberry oslo[/url]

  • Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how could we communicate?

  • Spot on with this write-up, I really think this web site needs a great deal more attention. I