02/13/14 5:00am
02/13/2014 5:00 AM

We can agree that nitrates in our surface water are a problem and may be the cause of the brown tide and red tide in the bay. Politicians and environmental groups have proposed that the removal of nitrates from our sanitary systems will mitigate this problem, and are forming a Wastewater Commission, comprising appointed political members to force the removal of all existing sanitary systems within 1,000 feet of the surface waters.

That may sound simple, but on close analysis it is problematic. The removal of existing sanitary systems, especially for older homes, requires excavating and removing nearby trees, and possibly destroying driveways, patios or lawns. After the installation of the new, experimental system, you still will face the task of replanting trees, reseeding lawns and the possible reconstruction of patios and driveways. There would be about 80,000 homes affected, whose owners would need to spend up to $20,000 per home to comply with these new laws. That is a cost of $1.6 billion.

Most of those homes are on the East End’s twin forks.

The problem with this mandate is that the removal of nitrates from individual sanitary systems is a very complex scientific and engineering problem and, at the present time, there is no proven way to remove nitrates from individual sanitary systems. There are some experimental systems, but they have not demonstrated effectiveness over the long term. You do not want to spend that kind of money and destroy all those yards without a proven, long-term solution.

What is needed is a committee of scientists and engineers to resolve the technical and engineering problems first before a law is put into effect.

Solve the technical problems first, then form a commission to implement the effective solution.

Joseph Fischetti, Southold

Mr. Fischetti runs a civil and structural engineering practice in Southold.

T0123_Water_BE_C.jpg

10/03/13 6:00am
10/03/2013 6:00 AM
BARBARAELLEN KOCH FILE PHOTO  |

BARBARAELLEN KOCH FILE PHOTO | Workers harvest grapes at a North Fork farm this summer.

On your story regarding the problem North Fork farmers are having in hiring people to help with the crops and the harvest, this is just a small part of the entire attitude of workers in today’s American welfare state.

A person who is out of work in New York can receive up to $405 a week, or $21,060 a year, for doing nothing except sitting home watching television. A person who is on welfare in NYC can also sit at home doing nothing except watching television, even while welfare provides the equivalent of an hourly pre-tax wage of $14.75, or $30,680 a year.

All while people who are not a citizen of this country, and are here to make enough money to support their families back home, wherever that might be, labor for a $12/hour salary working in 100-degree heat.

So the farmer on the North Fork is caught on the horns of a dilemma, where on one hand he is unable to get Americans to do the farm work and, on the other hand, there is less and less foreign labor to do the same work at equivalent costs.

09/26/13 6:00am
09/26/2013 6:00 AM
Suffolk theater opening

BARBARAELLEN KOCH PHOTO | East Main Street looking west near the theater.

To the editor:

I take exception to the “downtown Riverhead” references as expressed by Mike Roth of the Wading River Chamber of Commerce in last week’s feature article about Wading River’s ailing business district. Mr. Roth’s references that after years of decline, Wading River is “all of a sudden downtown Riverhead” and that the “worst case scenario is status quo, nothing moves on and it becomes another downtown Riverhead” are way off base.

These negative connotations may have applied to Riverhead’s downtown a few short years ago, however they do not apply at all today. Our downtown is now an example of successful downtown revitalization with over 15 new businesses opened up or planning to open soon. I have been here all of my life and have seen many attempts to turn our downtown around that did not take hold, however it is unmistakable that this time, downtown Riverhead’s revitalization is for real.

It is becoming a more vibrant and safe place to live, work and play as a result of the efforts of Supervisor Sean Walter, the Town Board, the Business Improvement District, Industrial Development Agency, the town’s community development office and the residents and businesses here. I have strolled through downtown many evenings to see people fishing and eating dinner along the riverfront and enjoying Grangebel Park, once a drug haven, now a wonderful park where people say hello to each other as they walk by.

Downtown Riverhead is back, it is safe and it is becoming a successful destination that no longer deserves or is representative of its past negative perceptions similar to those expressed by Mr. Roth.

Martin Sendlewsi, Riverhead

Editor’s note: Mr. Sendlewski is a partner in the Summerwind Square complex and sits on the downtown Business Improvement District board of directors.

05/09/13 6:00am
05/09/2013 6:00 AM
JENNIFER GUSTAVSON PHOTO | Elected officials met with education advocates Saturday in Middle Island.

FILE PHOTO | Elected officials met with education advocates earlier this year in Middle Island.

To the Editor:

Once again I read with great dismay your editor’s attack on public education. (See referenced editorial)

“For lawmakers to truly curb government spending across New York State they need to get public school teacher and administrator salaries … back into to the realm of what’s normal for middle income earners.”

Although “normal” is not a quantitative term, numbers are. The average income for a family in Southold Town is $61,108 while the average Mattituck teacher earns $62,718. I don’t think the extra $1,000 puts the educator out of the middle class into the upper class. Do you?

Lucille McKee, LAUREL

president, Shoreham-Wading River Teachers’ Association

To read more letters to the editor, pick of copy of this week’s News-Review on newsstands or click on the E-Paper.

01/10/13 6:00am
01/10/2013 6:00 AM

FILE PHOTO | A downed power line in Mattituck when Sandy struck the North Fork.

To the Editor:

Hearing again and again the news that Andrew Cuomo was blaming LIPA for not responding well to Sandy, and that he now wants to put it into private hands.

I keep thinking that no one seems to want to remember that his father, Mario, was the one who insisted on making LILCO a power authority run by political appointees, insisting that it was going to save us so much money and be more responsive to the needs of the residents, which in the beginning was just the opposite. They ignored the public completely; being an authority they didn’t have to listen to anyone.

Well I guess he is admitting that his father making the company an authority, with political appointees and no oversight, was an even bigger mistake.

I hope they really think this through and get it right this time.

Helga Guthy, Wading River

Read more Letters to the Editor in this week’s Riverhead News-Review available on newsstands or by clicking for the E-Paper.

12/06/12 6:00am
12/06/2012 6:00 AM
BARBARBAELLEN KOCH PHOTO | Thousand of cars parked at the town's Calverton Enterprise Park western runway.

BARBARBAELLEN KOCH PHOTO | Thousands of cars parked at EPCAL’s western runway.

To the Editor:

Riverhead Councilman John Dunleavy should check his facts before attacking community leaders in the newspaper (“Town did the right thing,” Nov. 29).

He charges that Pine Barrens Society executive director Richard Amper attacked the storage of cars wrecked by Superstorm Sandy on Riverhead Town land, but not on the land of private property owners.

In fact, Mr. Amper first broke the news about cars dumped in grasslands on the Burman property at EPCAL, before expressing concern about those heaped on town land. Then, he notified authorities about other car dumps in the Pine Barrens and state-designated Special Groundwater Protection areas.

The DEC and Suffolk are moving to force removal of cars from private lands and not on the land controlled by Riverhead. Most environmentalists agree with Mr. Amper that contaminants spilled from cars on pavement will end up in groundwater due to runoff from the pavement, so both sources of pollution should be addressed.

Dunleavy concludes, “Mr. Amper attacks Riverhead Town with his obviously biased opinions.”

What bias?

Matt VanGlad, Calverton

Read Mr. Dunleavy’s and more Letters to the Editor by clicking for the E-Paper.

11/08/12 4:00am
11/08/2012 4:00 AM

To the Editor:

To all politicians: mud slinging is childish and annoying to listen to. It’s like tattle-taling on the playground. You are mature men and women, please act your age in 2013.

Jim Dreeben, Riverhead

owner, Peconic Paddler

Read more Letters to the Editor in this week’s Riverhead News-Review available on newsstands or by clicking for the E-Paper.